Between the NOX Equation Soft Advanced and the NOX Equation Soft Advanced 2027, the primary manufacturer update is a slight reduction in overall weight range, moving from 360–375 g down to 355–365 g. In our assessment, the 2027 model shifts even further toward ultimate precision, moving from a 2 to a 1 on our 1-to-5 power vs control scale. For a buyer, both seasons provide a very similar playing experience, meaning the older edition remains a fantastic choice if found at a lower cost.
| Feature | NOX Equation Soft Advanced | NOX Equation Soft Advanced 2027 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Not stated | 2027 |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Weight | 360–375 g | 355–365 g |
| Thickness | Not stated | 38 mm |
| Face Material | Fiber Glass 3K | 3K Fiberglass |
| Frame Material | Not stated | Carbon |
| Core Material | Not stated | HR3 SOFT EVA |
| Level | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Core Hardness (our assessment) | Soft | Soft |
| Power vs Control (our assessment) | 2 (1=pure control, 5=pure power) | 1 (1=pure control, 5=pure power) |
| Sweet Spot (our assessment) | Large | Large |
| Player Types (our assessment) | Builder, Counter | Builder, Counter |
What changed between the seasons?
From the manufacturer specifications, the weight range dropped slightly for the 2027 season, moving from 360–375 g down to 355–365 g. The manufacturer also explicitly lists a 38 mm profile thickness, a Carbon frame, and an HR3 SOFT EVA core for the 2027 model. These specific details for thickness, frame, and core materials are not stated for the original model. Both versions retain a round shape, 3K fiberglass faces, and an intermediate player rating.
In our assessment, the performance emphasis leans even more into defensive stability. We rate the older NOX Equation Soft Advanced at a 2 on our power vs control scale, whereas we rate the 2027 version at a 1. Both share a soft core hardness, a large sweet spot, and cater to point builders and counter-attackers.
Is the newer season worth it?
The 2027 model is worth considering if you want a slightly lighter frame (355–365 g) that offers maximum arm comfort and extreme control. However, because both rackets feature round shapes, soft cores, and 3K fiberglass faces, the core performance on court remains very similar. If the older version is available at a lower price, it represents virtually identical value for intermediate players.
Who should buy which?
- NOX Equation Soft Advanced: In our assessment, this racket is ideal for intermediate right-side players or control-minded left-side players who want a soft feel, a large sweet spot, and a fraction more power bias (rated 2). It performs exceptionally well when defending off the glass or executing precise placement on a soft bandeja or vibora.
- NOX Equation Soft Advanced 2027: In our assessment, this version is best suited for intermediate counter-attackers and point builders seeking pure control (rated 1). The lighter weight range benefits players seeking enhanced maneuverability during quick net play, block volleys, and low-impact handling to reduce arm fatigue, though neither racket is built for heavy smash power.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main structural difference between the two models?
The manufacturer lists a lighter weight range for the 2027 model (355–365 g compared to 360–375 g). The 2027 version also explicitly details a Carbon frame and HR3 SOFT EVA core, which are not stated for the previous model.
Which racket is better for player arm comfort?
Both models feature a soft core hardness in our assessment and round shapes, which are easy on the joints. The 2027 model may feel slightly lighter in hand due to its lower manufacturer weight range, providing excellent arm comfort during defensive rallies.
Are both rackets suitable for defending off the glass?
Yes. Both rackets feature round shapes, soft feel, and large sweet spots, making them highly forgiving and controllable when defending off the glass and building points from the back of the court.