Racket comparisons

Dunlop Nanomax Pro vs NOX Equation Soft Advanced

A detailed comparison of the Dunlop Nanomax Pro and NOX Equation Soft Advanced for intermediate padel players. Learn which racket suits an all-round game versus a defensive builder approach.

By PadelLeague ·

AI-generatedThis article was written with AI.

Dunlop Nanomax Pro
Image: Dunlop
Dunlop Nanomax ProSpecs and offers
NOX Equation Soft Advanced
Image: NOX
NOX Equation Soft AdvancedSpecs and offers

The Dunlop Nanomax Pro is best suited for intermediate all-rounders who want a balanced 3 out of 5 power-to-control ratio and a medium core feel. Conversely, the NOX Equation Soft Advanced favors intermediate builders and counter-attackers who prioritize soft arm comfort, control, and defensive ease off the glass. Choosing between them depends on whether you prefer a versatile hybrid setup or a forgiving round frame focused on control.

FeatureDunlop Nanomax ProNOX Equation Soft Advanced
Player Level (manufacturer)IntermediateIntermediate
Frame Shape (manufacturer)Not statedRound
Frame Shape (our assessment)HybridNot stated
Weight (manufacturer)365 g360–375 g
Core Material (manufacturer)Pro EVANot stated
Face Material (manufacturer)Not statedFiber Glass 3K
Core Hardness (our assessment)MediumSoft
Power vs Control (our assessment)3 (balanced)2 (control-oriented)
Sweet Spot (our assessment)MediumLarge
Player Profile (our assessment)AllrounderBuilder, counter

Which one has more power?

In our assessment, the Dunlop Nanomax Pro provides a slightly higher power potential than the NOX Equation Soft Advanced. We rate the Dunlop Nanomax Pro at a 3 out of 5 on our power versus control scale, placing it dead center as a balanced racket. Combined with its Pro EVA core (as stated by the manufacturer) and what we rate as a medium core hardness, it allows players to generate crisp output when pressing forward at the net for overheads, bandejas, and aggressive flat smashes.

The NOX Equation Soft Advanced, by comparison, receives a 2 out of 5 rating on our power versus control scale, leaning firmly toward control. The manufacturer specifies a Fiber Glass 3K face, which offers good ball output, but in our assessment, its soft core hardness absorbs more impact energy on heavy overhead hits. While it generates solid depth without forcing your swing, it is less designed for finishing points with raw power.

Which is easier to play and defend with?

When defending off the glass or handling fast-paced rallies from the back of the court, the NOX Equation Soft Advanced offers higher overall ease of play. The manufacturer states that the NOX model features a round shape, and in our assessment, it boasts a large sweet spot paired with a soft core. This combination allows intermediate defenders and counter-players to block hard shots, execute controlled lobs, and recover tricky balls near the back wall with high forgiving feel.

The Dunlop Nanomax Pro is also manageable for intermediate players, but it demands slightly more precision. In our assessment, it features a hybrid shape and a medium sweet spot. This setup gives you a solid platform for varied placement, but off-center hits will not be quite as forgiving as on the round NOX frame. In terms of static mass, Dunlop lists the Nanomax Pro at 365 g, while NOX specifies a weight range of 360–375 g for the Equation Soft Advanced.

How do their materials and specifications compare?

Looking strictly at official brand specifications, Dunlop provides details on the internal core, specifying a Pro EVA core, but does not state the face material or official frame shape. Conversely, NOX provides details on the frame geometry and exterior face—noting a round shape and Fiber Glass 3K face—but leaves the specific manufacturer core material unstated.

To bridge these missing details, our assessment evaluates the structural characteristics based on the overall specifications. We rate the Dunlop Nanomax Pro as having a hybrid shape with a medium core hardness, targeting all-round performance. For the NOX Equation Soft Advanced, we rate the core hardness as soft, complementing its officially stated Fiber Glass 3K construction for maximum arm comfort and vibration dampening.

Who should buy which?

Dunlop Nanomax Pro

  • Intermediate all-rounders: Ideal for players who mix defensive patience with aggressive net play.
  • Balanced playstyle seekers: Suits those who want a neutral 3/5 power-to-control balance for transition shots, bandejas, and occasional smashes.
  • Medium feel preference: Suited for players who dislike overly soft cores and prefer moderate firmness at impact.

NOX Equation Soft Advanced

  • Builders and counter-attackers: Designed for players who operate mainly from the backcourt, waiting for tactical opportunities.
  • Comfort-focused players: Excellent for players looking for a soft core impact that reduces joint vibration.
  • High forgiveness seekers: Perfect for players who benefit from a round shape and a large sweet spot to minimize errors when defending off the glass.

Frequently asked questions

Which racket provides higher arm comfort?

In our assessment, the NOX Equation Soft Advanced offers superior arm comfort. Its soft core hardness cushions ball impact effectively, whereas the medium core hardness of the Dunlop Nanomax Pro delivers a slightly firmer feel.

Are both rackets suitable for intermediate players?

Yes, the manufacturers of both the Dunlop Nanomax Pro and the NOX Equation Soft Advanced explicitly categorize these rackets for intermediate level players.

What is the main structural difference between the two?

According to official specifications, the NOX Equation Soft Advanced is a round racket featuring a Fiber Glass 3K face, whereas Dunlop specifies a Pro EVA core (its face material and manufacturer shape are not stated). In our assessment, Dunlop utilizes a hybrid shape with medium hardness, whereas NOX uses a soft core setup.

Want to play yourself? Find tournaments and leagues near you.