Racket comparisons

adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 vs Wilson Bela Pro V3

A detailed comparison between the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 and the Wilson Bela Pro V3 for advanced padel players seeking control and structure.

By PadelLeague ·

AI-generatedThis article was written with AI.

adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5
Image: Doittennis
adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5Specs and offers
Wilson Bela Pro V3
Image: Wilson
Wilson Bela Pro V3Specs and offers

The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is tailored for advanced game builders who prioritize defensive control, a forgiving sweet spot, and a soft impact feel. The Wilson Bela Pro V3 caters to advanced builders looking for an even-balanced teardrop option with a medium core that provides slightly more punch on attack. Choose the adidas model for ultimate defensive resets off the glass, or the Wilson for extra versatility at the net.

Featureadidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5Wilson Bela Pro V3
ShapeRoundTeardrop
BalanceEvenEven
Weight365 g370 g
Frame MaterialCarbon 6KCarbon 24K
Core (Manufacturer)SoftMedium
LevelAdvancedAdvanced
Core Hardness (our assessment)SoftMedium
Power vs Control (our assessment)2 / 53 / 5
Sweet Spot (our assessment)LargeMedium
Player Types (our assessment)BuilderBuilder

Which racket offers more control and maneuverability?

In our assessment, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 delivers higher defensive control and forgiveness, earning a power versus control rating of 2 out of 5. Featuring a round shape, a static weight of 365 g, and a manufacturer-stated soft core, it excels in defensive situations such as digging out low balls off the glass or playing precise lobs. In our assessment, its large sweet spot provides extra security when constructing points from the back of the court.

By contrast, the Wilson Bela Pro V3 weighs 370 g and uses a teardrop shape. While both rackets feature an even balance, the Wilson model features a medium core (evaluated as medium hardness in our assessment). This combination offers a firmer impact touch. If your priority is maximum sweet spot size, ease of handling, and controlled placement, the round adidas frame gives you the edge in maneuverability.

Which one has more power on attacks?

When taking the initiative at the net with attacking volleys, bandejas, viboras, or aggressive smashes, the Wilson Bela Pro V3 yields greater power potential. In our assessment, we rate the Wilson model at a 3 out of 5 on the power versus control scale, compared to a 2 out of 5 for the adidas CTRL 3.5.

The Wilson's 370 g weight, Carbon 24K frame construction, and medium core allow players to put extra momentum behind overheads and fast net exchanges without relying on a head-heavy balance. Conversely, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 uses a Carbon 6K frame and a soft core. The softer impact absorbs more energy, favoring touch and placement over raw shot speed when finishing points.

Which is easier to play?

While both rackets are built for advanced players, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is generally more forgiving under pressure. Its 365 g weight is 5 g lighter than the Wilson, and in our assessment, its large sweet spot helps maintain ball direction even on off-center hits during fast rallies.

The Wilson Bela Pro V3 demands cleaner striking technique. With a medium sweet spot and a total weight of 370 g, it provides higher energy transfer when struck dead-center but offers less margin for error when forced into awkward defensive positions.

Who should buy which?

adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is best for:

  • Advanced builders who prefer a round shape with consistent defensive output.
  • Right-side or control players who rely on patient playmaking and wall resets.
  • Players seeking a soft core feel and a large sweet spot to maximize forgiveness.

Wilson Bela Pro V3 is best for:

  • Advanced builders seeking a balanced blend of control and power (rated 3 out of 5 in our assessment).
  • Players who prefer a teardrop shape with a Carbon 24K frame and medium core hardness.
  • Tactical players who want a slightly heavier (370 g) setup for punchier net play and overheads.

What player level are these rackets designed for?

Both manufacturers explicitly state that these rackets are designed for advanced players.

How do the power versus control ratings compare?

In our assessment, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 receives a 2 out of 5 on the power versus control scale (leaning strongly toward control), whereas the Wilson Bela Pro V3 receives a 3 out of 5 (balanced between power and control).

What are the main frame and core material differences?

The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is constructed with a Carbon 6K frame and a soft core. The Wilson Bela Pro V3 uses a Carbon 24K frame paired with a medium core.

Want to play yourself? Find tournaments and leagues near you.