

The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is engineered for advanced control-oriented builders who prioritize placement, arm comfort, and a wide forgiveness area when defending off the glass. Conversely, the Siux Electra Pro caters to advanced allrounders seeking direct ball feedback and offensive punch on overheads through its firm core and versatile geometry. Both models target experienced players, but they deliver contrasting court experiences based on their structural design.
| Feature | adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 | Siux Electra Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer Shape | Round | Teardrop |
| Manufacturer Balance | Even | Even |
| Manufacturer Weight | 365 g | 355–375 g |
| Frame Material | Carbon 6K | Carbon 12K |
| Manufacturer Core | Soft | Hard |
| Target Level (Manufacturer) | Advanced | Advanced |
| Core Hardness (our assessment) | Soft | Hard |
| Power vs Control (our assessment) | 2 (Control focus) | 4 (Power focus) |
| Sweet Spot (our assessment) | Large | Medium |
| Player Type (our assessment) | Builder | Allrounder |
Which one has more power?
When evaluating offensive potential, structural firmness and shape play a decisive role. The Siux Electra Pro is constructed with a Carbon 12K frame and a hard core according to the manufacturer. In our assessment, this high core hardness yields a power-vs-control rating of 4 out of 5 on our scale (where 1 represents pure control and 5 represents pure power). The firm surface combined with its teardrop shape allows aggressive players to transfer energy efficiently into offensive shots like smashes, deep bandejas, and sharp viboras without the core absorbing impact energy.
The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 features a round geometry paired with a soft core. In our assessment, we rate its power-vs-control capability at a 2 out of 5. Because the soft core absorbs more force upon ball contact, it produces a cushioned feel rather than maximum raw velocity on overhead smashes.
Which is easier to play and offers more control?
Control and defensive consistency depend heavily on frame geometry and core density. The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 relies on a traditional round shape and an even balance at a static weight of 365 g. In our assessment, we rate its sweet spot as large, giving players significant leeway when striking off-center balls near the glass. The combination of a soft core (stated by the manufacturer and confirmed soft in our assessment) and a Carbon 6K frame provides high ball output at slower swing speeds and enhances arm comfort by dampening vibrations during defensive rallies.
The Siux Electra Pro features an even balance within a weight spread of 355 to 375 g, but its teardrop outline and hard core yield a medium sweet spot in our assessment. While it maintains stability, off-center hits require precise technique due to the reduced forgiveness of the firm core.
How do they perform in specific padel situations?
From the back of the court, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 excels during defensive phases. When defending off the back glass or attempting precise chiquitas into the feet of oncoming net players, the round shape and large sweet spot (in our assessment) provide exceptional precision and comfort.
At the net, the dynamics shift toward the Siux Electra Pro. Its teardrop geometry and hard core allow allrounders to block heavy fast-paced balls without trampoline effect, giving crisp feedback on volleys. When stepping up to execute aggressive bandejas or kick smashes, the firmer core ensures maximum energy return.
Who should buy which?
adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is ideal for:
- Advanced right-side or left-side tacticians who play a builder role, setting up points with consistency.
- Players seeking extra arm comfort via a soft core density that minimizes frame vibration.
- Defensive specialists who rely on a large sweet spot (in our assessment) to handle difficult wall rebounds.
Siux Electra Pro is ideal for:
- Advanced allrounders who want versatility across all court zones.
- Attackers who prioritize high power (rated 4 out of 5 in our assessment) for overheads, bandejas, and viboras.
- Players who prefer the direct, crisp feedback of a hard core combined with a Carbon 12K frame construction.
Which racket has a larger sweet spot?
In our assessment, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 features a large sweet spot, whereas the Siux Electra Pro possesses a medium sweet spot.
What are the core hardness differences?
According to the manufacturer specifications, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is built with a soft core (rated soft in our assessment), while the Siux Electra Pro features a hard core (rated hard in our assessment).
What player levels are these rackets designed for?
Both the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 and the Siux Electra Pro are specified by their respective manufacturers for advanced level padel players.
