Racket comparisons

adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 vs Dunlop Nanomax Pro

A head-to-head analysis of the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 and Dunlop Nanomax Pro padel rackets based on manufacturer specs and our technical assessment.

By PadelLeague ·

AI-generatedThis article was written with AI.

adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5
Image: Doittennis
adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5Specs and offers
Dunlop Nanomax Pro
Image: Dunlop
Dunlop Nanomax ProSpecs and offers

The adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is engineered for advanced control specialists and game builders who rely on precision, high defensive absorption, and a forgiving hit zone. Conversely, the Dunlop Nanomax Pro targets intermediate allrounders seeking a central balance between offensive pop and defensive feel. Your choice depends on whether you need a dedicated, soft-feeling control racket or a versatile, medium-hardness all-court frame.

Featureadidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5Dunlop Nanomax Pro
Target Level (manufacturer)AdvancedIntermediate
Weight (manufacturer)365 g365 g
Frame Material (manufacturer)Carbon 6KNot stated
Shape (manufacturer)RoundNot stated
Balance (manufacturer)EvenNot stated
Core Material (manufacturer)SoftPro EVA
Shape (our assessment)Round (our assessment)Hybrid (our assessment)
Core Hardness (our assessment)Soft (our assessment)Medium (our assessment)
Power vs Control Scale 1-5 (our assessment)2 - Control focused (our assessment)3 - Balanced (our assessment)
Sweet Spot (our assessment)Large (our assessment)Medium (our assessment)
Target Player Type (our assessment)Builder (our assessment)Allrounder (our assessment)

Which racket offers more power and control?

When evaluating performance on our 1 to 5 scale—where 1 represents pure control and 5 represents pure power—these two frames occupy distinctly different roles. In our assessment, we rate the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 at a 2, placing it firmly in the control-focused category. The manufacturer states it uses a soft core, which in our assessment results in a soft core hardness. This soft feel allows players to absorb heavy incoming pace during defensive situations, such as resetting quick rallies from deep near the glass or placing delicate chiquitas past opponents at the net.

In contrast, we rate the Dunlop Nanomax Pro at a 3 on our power versus control scale, reflecting a balanced output suitable for all-court play. Dunlop specifies a Pro EVA core, which in our assessment provides a medium core hardness. This firmer touch offers slightly more output on overhead strikes like bandejas, viboras, and flat smashes. While it does not feature the pure touch absorption of the adidas, it gives intermediate players a reliable blend of punch and control across different match phases.

Which racket is easier to handle and play with?

Handling characteristics depend heavily on geometry, weight distribution, and sweet spot tolerance. Both rackets share an identical manufacturer weight of 365 grams, but their playing dynamics diverge in other areas. The manufacturer lists the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 with a round shape and an even balance. In our assessment, this configuration yields a large sweet spot, making off-center hits remarkably forgiving and aiding arm comfort during extended rallies.

For the Dunlop Nanomax Pro, the manufacturer does not state the official frame shape or balance. However, in our assessment, the racket features a hybrid shape paired with a medium sweet spot. This setup provides reasonable maneuverability and stability for players who move frequently between defense at the back glass and attacking positions at the net. Intermediate players will find the medium sweet spot accessible, though it demands slightly more centered striking than the round adidas.

How do their materials and target player profiles compare?

The structural builds highlight different design priorities. According to manufacturer specifications, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 incorporates a Carbon 6K frame and a soft core, designed specifically for advanced players. In our assessment, this construction is ideal for tactical builders who construct points through consistent placement and high-volume shot placement. The soft touch reduces vibrations, offering good arm comfort when blocking high-speed smashes.

The Dunlop Nanomax Pro features a Pro EVA core and is targeted by the manufacturer at intermediate players. The manufacturer does not state the frame material, balance, or shape specs for this model. In our assessment, its combination of medium core hardness and hybrid geometry creates an adaptable platform for allrounder profiles who play both right-side and left-side positions without leaning heavily toward extreme power or pure control.

Who should buy which racket?

Select the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 if you:

  • Are an advanced player looking for high precision and touch.
  • Classify your playing style as a builder who controls tempo from deep court.
  • Prefer a soft core hardness combined with a large sweet spot for maximum forgiving play off the glass.
  • Want a defined round shape with an even balance for easy maneuverability.

Select the Dunlop Nanomax Pro if you:

  • Are an intermediate player looking for a balanced all-round racket.
  • Prefer a medium core hardness that delivers a balanced 3/5 power-to-control ratio.
  • Want a versatile racket suited for dynamic transitions between defensive lobbing and net play.
  • Do not require specialized specs like Carbon 6K framing or a dedicated round geometry.

Which racket is better for defensive resets off the glass?

In our assessment, the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 is better suited for defensive resets off the glass. Its round shape, even balance, soft core hardness, and large sweet spot help absorb high ball speed and direct returns with high precision.

What are the main spec differences declared by the manufacturers?

The manufacturer of the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 specifies a round shape, even balance, 365 g weight, Carbon 6K frame, soft core, and an advanced target level. The manufacturer of the Dunlop Nanomax Pro specifies a 365 g weight, Pro EVA core, and intermediate level, while leaving shape, balance, and frame material unstated.

What core hardness can players expect from each model?

According to manufacturer specs, adidas uses a soft core while Dunlop uses Pro EVA. In our assessment, this translates to a soft core hardness for the adidas Metalbone Carbon CTRL 3.5 and a medium core hardness for the Dunlop Nanomax Pro.

Want to play yourself? Find tournaments and leagues near you.